在不久的将来，热爱企业权力和环境衰败正在蹂躏着地球。Hen（西尔莎·罗南 Saoirse Ronan 饰）和Junior（保罗·麦斯卡 Paul Mescal 饰）是一对年轻夫妇，热爱结婚七年，在他们与世隔绝的农场过着孤独的生活。一天晚上，一个名叫Terrance（亚伦·皮埃尔 Aaron Pierre 饰）的陌生人敲响了他们的房门，带来的消息让他们的生活陷入了混乱。Junior被随机选中，前往一个围绕地球运行的大型实验空间站。最不寻常的是什么？Junior离开后的一切安排都做好了。Hen没有机会想念他，因为她一秒钟独处的时间都没有。Hen会有熟悉的同伴，促使她做出改变生活的决定。
紫龙
回复 :在根据莎士比亚戏剧《暴风雨》改编的这部影片里，导演格林纳韦充分发挥了奇思异想，展现出大有前途的想象力。普罗斯佩罗在自己的脑海中虚构《暴风雨》的画面，每当剧中人物出场的时候，他就替他们说出了他们的台词。影片完全可以看作是《暴风雨》的另一个新的版本。演员的表演很有分寸，令人赏心悦目，观众也会有一种享受盛宴的感觉。当然影片给观众所提出的挑战也非同一般，显然只有熟悉莎士比亚的《暴风雨》的观众才能更好地欣赏它。
回复 :在一场品酒大会上，玛姬初识行为不羁的奥利佛，但在玛姬眼中奥利佛是一个没有酒品的家伙，然二人却因不同的特质而相互吸引。一位律师的委托案，使玛姬及奥利佛为运送一瓶价值非凡的名酒－「慧星之年」已成为嗜酒老饕及一群野心家们抢夺的目标，使他俩卷入一连串的阴谋中···
成侑彬
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
