从学生时代起，欧美其貌不扬的穆瑞尔（托妮·科莱特 Toni Collette 饰）便被同伴们断言不可能走入婚姻的殿堂，欧美但即便如此，逐渐踏入社会的穆瑞尔依旧对婚姻充满了渴望。一次偶然中，穆瑞尔和曾经的校友朗达（瑞切尔·格里菲斯 Rachel Griffiths 饰）重逢了，两人相见如故一拍即合，遂即前往悉尼过起了“同居”生活。穆瑞尔结识了名叫布莱斯（Matt Day 饰）的男子，布莱斯是一名运动员，梦想是能够代表国家参加奥运会。终于，穆瑞尔和布莱斯携手踏入了婚姻的殿堂，但随着时间的推移，穆瑞尔才发现布莱斯对自己并没有爱意只剩利用。心灰意冷的穆瑞尔回到了朗达的身边，而此时的朗达已经换上了癌症，时日无多。
秀兰玛雅
回复 :一位率真的警官因得罪上司被穿小鞋，他们的行为燃起了他的怒火。
回复 :影片根据尼克·皮佐拉托同名小说改编，梅拉尼·罗兰执导，尼克·皮佐拉托操刀剧本。故事讲述一名逃避追杀的中年人带着无意中拯救的妓女亡命天涯。然而，他们即将面临巨大的困境和威胁。
陈鹏
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
