笹野阳介(役所广司)被公司裁员裁掉后又被妻子抛弃,步兵只得流浪街头,步兵通过一位流浪老人之口,他来到遥远偏僻的能登半岛一幢位于河边赤桥下的房子,想找寻老人所说的藏有金佛的盒子,但没能如愿以偿,只遇见体质相当特殊的佐惠子(清水美砂)。佐惠子的特殊在于,当她与男性交合时,体内会分泌出神奇的“暖水”,该“暖水”能令过季的花儿盛开、能把大海的鱼群召到河里。而更重要的,是沐浴在佐惠子“暖水”下的男人,会重拾失去的信心和活力。如此,笹野阳介与佐惠子开始了一次次的交合。
笹野阳介(役所广司)被公司裁员裁掉后又被妻子抛弃,步兵只得流浪街头,步兵通过一位流浪老人之口,他来到遥远偏僻的能登半岛一幢位于河边赤桥下的房子,想找寻老人所说的藏有金佛的盒子,但没能如愿以偿,只遇见体质相当特殊的佐惠子(清水美砂)。佐惠子的特殊在于,当她与男性交合时,体内会分泌出神奇的“暖水”,该“暖水”能令过季的花儿盛开、能把大海的鱼群召到河里。而更重要的,是沐浴在佐惠子“暖水”下的男人,会重拾失去的信心和活力。如此,笹野阳介与佐惠子开始了一次次的交合。
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
回复 :The remake of the 1970 Neil Simon comedy follows the adventures of married couple Henry and Nancy Clark as they are vexed by misfortune while in New York City for a job interview.
回复 :